BOXSCORE: 2011 Houston Astros At 2011 Chicago (AL) Whitesox 4/19/2011
Astros AB R H RBI AVG Whitesox AB R H RBI AVG
J.Schafer CF 4 0 0 1 .256 A.Ramirez SS 3 2 2 1 .273
J.Altuve 2B 4 0 2 0 .367 G.Beckham 2B 2 1 1 2 .227
M.Downs RF 4 0 1 0 .477 P.Konerko 1B 4 0 1 0 .346
C.Lee LF 4 0 0 0 .163 C.Quentin DH 4 0 2 0 .261
B.Wallace 1B 3 0 0 0 .146 O.Vizquel 3B 4 0 1 0 .455
B.Bogusevic DH 3 0 0 0 .278 A.Rios CF 4 0 0 0 .190
C.Johnson 3B 2 0 0 0 .250 B.Lillibridge RF 2 0 0 0 .000
B-J.Paredes PH,3B 1 0 0 0 .250 A-A.De Aza PH,RF 1 0 0 0 .294
C.Barmes SS 3 0 0 0 .167 A.Pierzynski C 3 0 0 0 .087
H.Quintero C 3 1 1 0 .235 J.Pierre LF 3 0 0 0 .105
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 31 1 4 1 Totals 30 3 7 3
A-Pinch Hit For Lillibridge In 6th Inning
B-Pinch Hit For Johnson In 8th Inning
Astros.......... 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 1 4 1
Whitesox........ 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 - 3 7 0
Astros (5-7) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
J.Lyles 5 1/3 5 1 1 3 3 1 85 2.19
W.Lopez LOSS(0-2) 2 2/3 2 2 2 1 0 1 42 9.00
Totals 8 7 3 3 4 3 2
Whitesox (2-5) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
G.Floyd WIN(1-0) 9 4 1 1 0 5 0 106 2.20
Totals 9 4 1 1 0 5 0
ATTENDANCE- 15,994 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Greg Gibson, Sam Holbrook, Gerry Davis, Bill Hohn
T- 2:23
LEFT ON BASE- Astros: 3 Whitesox: 7
DOUBLE PLAYS- Astros: 1 Whitesox: 0
ERRORS- B.Wallace
DOUBLES- M.Downs(9th), H.Quintero(1st), O.Vizquel(1st)
HOME RUNS- A.Ramirez(1st), G.Beckham(1st)
RBIs- J.Schafer(4th), A.Ramirez(1st), G.Beckham-2(3rd)
STOLEN BASES- J.Altuve(3rd)
WALKS- A.Ramirez, G.Beckham-2, A.De Aza
STRIKE OUTS- B.Wallace-3, C.Johnson, C.Barmes, A.Ramirez, P.Konerko,
A.Pierzynski
GIDP- C.Quentin
WILD PITCHES- G.Floyd
RLISP 2-out- C.Lee-2, O.Vizquel-2, A.Pierzynski-2
Gavin Floyd delivered 9 solid innings as the Chicago (AL) Whitesox defeated
the Houston Astros 3 to 1 at US Cellular Field.
Floyd(1-0) was simply too much for the Houston batters. He gave up just 4
hits and no walks in 9 innings lowering his ERA to 2.20. Chicago (AL) rapped
out 7 hits for the afternoon.
Wilton Lopez(0-2) was hit with the loss in relief. He pitched 2 and 2/3
innings allowing 2 hits and 1 walk.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
▼
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
-
▼
March 2014
(72)
- BAL 19 vs. KC 15
- KC 14 vs. BAL 18
- BAL 17 vs. NYY 14
- NYY 13 vs. MIN 14
- MIN 13 vs. NYY 12
- MIN 12 vs. TBY 12
- TBY 11 vs. MIN 11
- BAL 16 vs. NYY 11
- HOU 19 vs. BAL 15
- BAL 14 vs. HOU 18
- TOR 19 vs. BOS 16
- TOR 18 vs. BOS 15
- BOS 14 vs TOR 17
- BOS 13 vs. TOR 16
- DET 11 vs. TEX 19
- TEX 18 vs. DET 10
- TEX 17 vs. SEA 13
- BOS 12 vs. TBY 10
- BOS 11 vs. TBY 9
- TBY 8 vs. BOS 10
- TBY 7 vs. BOS 9
- NYY 10 vs. CLE 11
- HOU 17 vs. DET 9
- DET 8 vs. HOU 16
- KC 13 vs. BOS 8
- BOS 7 vs. KC 12
- LAA 15 vs. SEA 12
- LAA 14 vs. SEA 11
- SEA 10 vs. LAA 13
- SEA 9 vs. LAA 12
- MIN 10 vs. TEX 16
- TEX 15 vs. MIN 9
- OAK 10 vs. LAA 11
- TOR 15 vs. KC 11
- MIN 8 vs. CHI 19
- MIN 7 vs. CHI 18
- CHI 17 vs. MIN 6
- CHI 16 vs. MIN 5
- OAK 9 vs. TBY 6
- TBY 5 vs. OAK 8
- CLE 10 vs. CHI 15
- CLE 9 vs. CHI 14
- CHI 13 vs. CLE 8
- CHI 12 vs. CLE 7
- BAL 13 vs. TOR 14
- BAL 12 vs. TOR 13
- TOR 12 vs. CHI 11
- CLE 6 vs. KC 10
- CLE 5 vs. KC 9
- LAA 10 vs. HOU 15
- LAA 9 vs. HOU 14
- LAA 8 vs. NYY 9
- NYY 8 vs. LAA 7
- TEX 14 vs. BAL 11
- BAL 10 vs. TEX 13
- CHI 10 vs. TEX 12
- TEX 11 vs. CHI 9
- KC 8 vs. DET 7
- KC 7 vs. DET 6
- OAK 7 vs. BAL 9
- BAL 8 vs. OAK 6
- CHI 8 vs. HOU 13
- HOU 12 vs. CHI 7
- NYY 7 vs. TEX 10
- TEX 9 vs. TOR 11
- TOR 10 vs. TEX 8
- NYY 6 vs. SEA 8
- DET 5 vs. NYY 5
- NYY 4 vs. DET 4
- CHI 6 vs. TOR 9
- BAL 7 vs. LAA 6
- LAA 5 vs. BAL 6
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Sunday, March 2, 2014
HOU 12 vs. CHI 7
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment