BOXSCORE: 2012 San Diego Padres At 2012 Arizona D-Backs 6/26/2012
Padres AB R H RBI AVG D-Backs AB R H RBI AVG
C.Maybin CF 3 1 2 1 .232 W.Bloomquist SS 3 0 2 1 .264
W.Venable RF 4 0 0 0 .196 G.Parra CF 4 1 1 0 .286
L.Gregerson P 0 0 0 0 ---- B.Shaw P 0 0 0 0 .000
D.Thayer P 0 0 0 0 ---- D.Hernandez P 0 0 0 0 .000
C.Headley 3B 3 0 0 0 .319 B.Ziegler P 0 0 0 0 .000
C.Quentin LF 3 1 1 1 .255 J.Upton RF 4 0 0 0 .206
Y.Alonso 1B 4 0 1 0 .299 J.Kubel LF 4 0 1 1 .258
Y.Grandal C 3 0 0 0 .225 P.Goldschmidt 1B 3 0 1 0 .258
E.Cabrera SS 3 0 0 0 .255 M.Montero C 2 0 1 0 .245
A.Amarista 2B 3 0 0 0 .233 C-C.Young PR 0 1 0 0 .161
E.Volquez P 2 0 0 0 .200 A.Hill 2B 3 0 0 0 .221
B-C.Denorfia PH,RF 1 0 0 0 .271 C.Johnson 3B 3 0 0 0 .333
I.Kennedy P 2 1 1 0 .158
A-A.Eaton PH,CF 2 0 2 1 .250
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 29 2 4 2 Totals 30 3 9 3
A-Pinch Hit For Kennedy In 7th Inning
B-Pinch Hit For Volquez In 8th Inning
C-Pinch Ran For Montero In 9th Inning
Padres.......... 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 2 4 0
D-Backs......... 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 - 3 9 0
Padres (11-19) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
E.Volquez 7 8 2 2 3 7 0 110 4.50
L.Gregerson LOSS(1-5) 1 1/3 0 1 1 2 0 0 26 5.50
D.Thayer 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0.00
Totals 8 1/3 9 3 3 5 7 0
D-Backs (16-19) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
I.Kennedy 7 3 2 2 2 6 2 96 5.31
B.Shaw 0 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 7.30
D.Hernandez 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 28 2.29
B.Ziegler WIN(1-0) 0 2/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 4.02
Totals 9 4 2 2 4 7 2
ATTENDANCE- 17,414 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Alfonso Marquez, Chad Fairchild, Tom Hallion, Brian O'Nora
T- 2:46
LEFT ON BASE- Padres: 4 D-Backs: 7
DOUBLE PLAYS- Padres: 1 D-Backs: 2
DOUBLES- W.Bloomquist(6th), G.Parra(9th), J.Kubel(5th), A.Eaton(1st)
HOME RUNS- C.Maybin(3rd), C.Quentin(6th)
RBIs- C.Maybin(11th), C.Quentin(19th), W.Bloomquist(12th), J.Kubel(22nd),
A.Eaton(3rd)
STOLEN BASES- P.Goldschmidt(4th)
CAUGHT STEALING- W.Bloomquist
SACRIFICE HITS- A.Hill
WALKS- C.Maybin, C.Headley, C.Quentin, Y.Grandal, W.Bloomquist, P.Goldschmidt,
M.Montero-2, C.Johnson
STRIKE OUTS- W.Venable, C.Headley-2, C.Quentin-2, Y.Alonso, E.Volquez, J.Upton,
J.Kubel-2, P.Goldschmidt, M.Montero, C.Johnson-2
GIDP- C.Headley, Y.Grandal, A.Hill
2-out RBI- C.Quentin, J.Kubel
RLISP 2-out- M.Montero, J.Upton, G.Parra
TEAM RISP- Padres: 0 for 1 D-Backs: 4 for 9
In an exciting finish the Arizona ballclub pulled out a win over the San Diego
Padres by a score of 3 to 2 at Chase Field.
The game was decided in the bottom of the 9th inning. Miguel Montero drew a
walk. Aaron Hill was next and he laid down a sacrifice bunt. Chris Johnson
then drew a walk. Adam Eaton came up and he delivered a single making
Arizona the victors to the delight of the home town faithful. Arizona ended
up with 9 hits for the game while San Diego had 4.
The winning pitcher was Brad Ziegler(1-0) who allowed no runs in 2/3 of an
inning. Luke Gregerson(1-5) ended up with the loss in relief. He allowed 1
run and no hits in 1 and 1/3 innings.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
▼
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
-
▼
April 2015
(47)
- PIT 36 vs. MIA 36
- SD 36 vs. SF 36
- SD 35 vs. SF 35
- SF 34 vs. SD 34
- COL 36 vs. SD 33
- COL 35 vs. SD 32
- SD 31 vs. ARZ 36
- SD 30 vs. ARZ 35
- NY 36 vs. SD 29
- MIA 35 vs. SD 28
- SD 27 vs. NY 35
- SD 26 vs. COL 34
- MIA 34 vs. PIT 35
- MIL 36 vs. CIN 36
- MIL 35 vs. CIN 35
- CIN 34 vs. PHI 36
- PHI 35 vs. CIN 33
- WAS 36 vs. CIN 32
- WAS 35 vs. MIA 33
- WAS 34 vs. MIA 32
- STL 36 vs. CHI 36
- STL 35 vs. CHI 35
- CHI 34 vs. STL 34
- STL 33 vs. ATL 36
- ATL 35 vs. STL 32
- CIN 31 vs. SF 33
- SF 32 vs. CIN 30
- MIA 31 vs. ATL 34
- MIA 30 vs. ATL 33
- SF 31 vs. MIA 29
- SF 30 vs. MIA 27
- NY 34 vs. WAS 33
- NY 33 vs. WAS 34
- ARZ 34 vs. SF 29
- ARZ 33 vs. SF 28
- PHI 34 vs. WAS 31
- PHI 33 vs. WAS 30
- COL 33 vs. ATL 32
- ATL 31 vs. COL 32
- WAS 29 vs. PHI 32
- NY 32 vs. PHI 31
- NY 31 vs. PHI 30
- SF 27 vs. ARZ 32
- SF 26 vs. ARZ 31
- WAS 28 vs. NY 30
- SF 25 vs. LA 36
- SF 24 vs. LA 35
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
SD 30 vs. ARZ 35
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment