BOXSCORE: 2012 Chicago (AL) Whitesox At 2012 Minnesota Twins 4/15/2012
Whitesox AB R H RBI AVG Twins AB R H RBI AVG
A.De Aza CF 5 0 0 0 .167 D.Span CF 3 0 1 3 .400
B.Morel 3B 4 1 2 0 .500 B.Revere RF 4 0 1 0 .375
D-J.Danks PH 0 0 0 0 ---- J.Mauer C 4 0 0 0 .188
E-J.Lopez PH,3B 2 1 2 0 .182 J.Willingham LF 3 0 0 0 .154
A.Dunn 1B 5 1 2 1 .208 J.Morneau 1B 5 0 1 1 .389
P.Konerko DH 2 0 0 1 .167 R.Doumit DH 5 0 0 0 .222
A.Pierzynski C 5 1 1 2 .273 T.Plouffe 3B 4 2 2 0 .176
A.Rios RF 3 0 1 0 .292 B.Dozier SS 5 1 2 0 .313
A-B.Lillibridge PR,RF 1 0 0 0 .200 J.Carroll 2B 2 0 0 0 .154
A.Ramirez SS 5 0 1 0 .267 B-C.Parmelee PH 1 0 1 11.000
D.Viciedo LF 4 0 0 0 .115 C-D.Mastroianni PR,2B 1 3 1 01.000
G.Beckham 2B 5 1 2 0 .240
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 41 5 11 4 Totals 37 6 9 5
A-Pinch Ran For Rios In 8th Inning
B-Pinch Hit For Carroll In 8th Inning
C-Pinch Ran For Parmelee In 8th Inning
D-Pinch Hit For Morel In 9th Inning
E-Pinch Hit For Danks In 9th Inning
INJURY: Alex Rios INJURED (for 0 more games) in 8th inning
Whitesox........ 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 - 5 11 0
Twins........... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 1 - 6 9 0
Whitesox (1-6) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
J.Peavy 7 5 2 2 2 4 0 99 2.40
M.Thornton BS(1st) 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 21 6.00
A.Reed HOLD(1st) 0 1/3 1 2 2 1 0 0 14 54.00
H.Santiago BS(1st) 1 2/3 1 0 0 1 1 0 24 1.23
J.Crain LOSS(0-1) 0 2/3 0 1 1 1 1 0 11 1.93
Totals 10 2/3 9 6 6 7 6 0
Twins (1-3) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
L.Hendriks 5 5 2 2 2 2 0 65 3.60
B.Duensing 0 2/3 1 1 1 2 0 0 12 4.50
J.Burton 2 2/3 1 1 1 1 2 0 37 7.71
G.Perkins 0 2/3 3 1 1 1 1 0 19 9.00
M.Capps WIN(1-0) 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 26 0.00
Totals 11 11 5 5 7 6 0
ATTENDANCE- 38,022 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Paul Nauert, Dana Demuth, Kerwin Danley, Doug Eddings
T- 3:31
LEFT ON BASE- Whitesox:12 Twins: 8
DOUBLE PLAYS- Whitesox: 2 Twins: 2
DOUBLES- B.Morel(1st), J.Lopez(2nd), D.Span(2nd), T.Plouffe(1st)
RBIs- A.Dunn(5th), P.Konerko(1st), A.Pierzynski-2(3rd), D.Span-3(4th),
J.Morneau(5th), C.Parmelee(1st)
STOLEN BASES- G.Beckham(1st), B.Revere(5th), D.Mastroianni-3(3rd)
SACRIFICE HITS- B.Revere
SACRIFICE FLIES- A.Pierzynski, D.Span
WALKS- A.De Aza, A.Dunn, P.Konerko-4, D.Viciedo, D.Span-2, J.Mauer,
J.Willingham-2, T.Plouffe, D.Mastroianni
HIT BY PITCH- A.Rios
STRIKE OUTS- B.Morel-2, A.Dunn, P.Konerko, B.Lillibridge, D.Viciedo,
J.Willingham, J.Morneau, R.Doumit-2, T.Plouffe, B.Dozier
GIDP- D.Viciedo-2, J.Morneau, J.Carroll
WILD PITCHES- M.Thornton, L.Hendriks, B.Duensing
2-out RBI- J.Morneau
RLISP 2-out- A.Pierzynski-2, J.Willingham-2, B.Dozier, A.Dunn, B.Morel,
G.Beckham, D.Viciedo, R.Doumit-2, B.Lillibridge
TEAM RISP- Whitesox: 2 for 14 Twins: 3 for 10
38,022 fans were treated to a fine game at Target Field as only one run
separated the combatants at game's end. The Minnesota Twins won by the
slimmest of margins, 6 to 5.
The score was tied at 5 after nine. Minnesota won it in the 11th inning.
After an out was recorded, Darin Mastroianni drew a walk. Mastroianni stole
second with some aggressive base running. Minnesota continued their
aggressive style with another stolen base. Denard Span followed next and he
hit a sacrifice fly making Minnesota victorious to the delight of the the
home town crowd. Minnesota finished with 9 hits in the victory.
The win was credited to Matt Capps(1-0) who went 2 innings allowing no runs.
Jesse Crain(0-1) was the losing pitcher in relief. He surrendered no hits
and 1 walk in 2/3 of an inning.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
▼
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
-
▼
August 2015
(26)
- CHI 7 vs. MIN 4
- TBY 5 vs. BAL 4
- CHI 6 vs. TBY 4
- TBY 3 vs. CHI 5
- TEX 3 vs. OAK 3
- MIN 3 vs. TEX 2
- CLE 5 vs. MIN 2
- CLE 4 vs. MIN 1
- BAL 3 vs. KC 5
- KC 4 vs. BAL 2
- HOU 7 vs. TBY 2
- TBY 1 vs. HOU 6
- HOU 5 vs. TEX 1
- DET 4 vs. CHI 4
- DET 3 vs. CHI 3
- CHI 2 vs. DET 2
- CHI 1 vs. DET 1
- KC 3 vs. CLE 3
- HOU 3 vs. CLE 2
- CLE 1 vs. HOU 3
- HOU 2 vs. TOR 4
- TOR 3 vs. HOU 1
- KC 2 vs. TOR 2
- TOR 1 vs. KC 1
- OAK 2 vs. BAL 1
- OAK 1 vs. SEA 1
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Sunday, August 30, 2015
CHI 7 vs. MIN 4
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment