BOXSCORE: 2013 Chicago (NL) Cubs At 2013 Cincinnati Reds 7/10/2013 Cubs AB R H RBI AVG Reds AB R H RBI AVG D.Dejesus CF 4 2 1 1 .241 S.Choo CF 3 1 1 0 .268 S.Castro SS 6 1 1 0 .213 Z.Cozart SS 5 2 3 3 .244 D.Navarro C 5 2 2 3 .225 J.Votto 1B 4 1 2 3 .289 A.Rizzo 1B 5 0 1 0 .220 B.Phillips 2B 6 0 1 0 .262 R.Sweeney LF 5 1 2 2 .324 J.Bruce RF 5 1 1 0 .220 B.Bogusevic RF 5 0 1 0 .292 T.Frazier 3B 4 0 1 1 .177 L.Valbuena 3B 1 0 0 0 .208 H-D.Robinson PR 0 0 0 0 .163 A-N.Schierholtz PR,3B 2 1 0 0 .235 S.Lecure P 0 0 0 0 .000 D.Barney 2B 4 0 1 1 .168 I-C.Heisey PH,LF 2 1 1 0 .176 J.Grimm P 1 0 0 0 .000 X.Paul LF 4 0 1 0 .267 B-W.Castillo PH 1 0 0 0 .243 T.Cingrani P 0 0 0 0 .250 P.Strop P 0 0 0 01.000 J-R.Hanigan PH 0 0 0 0 .208 H.Rondon P 1 0 1 01.000 D.Mesoraco C 2 0 0 0 .287 J.Russell P 0 0 0 0 .000 D-C.Miller C 3 0 1 1 .333 F-D.Sappelt PH 1 0 0 0 .105 M.Leake P 1 1 1 0 .333 K.Gregg P 0 0 0 0 ---- C-B.Hamilton PH 1 0 0 0 .222 M.Bowden P 1 0 0 0 .000 A.Simon P 0 0 0 0 ---- M.Guerrier P 0 0 0 0 ---- E-R.Ludwick PH 1 0 0 0 .333 J.Hoover P 0 0 0 0 ---- G-J.Hannahan PH,3B 1 1 0 0 .229 -- -- -- --- -- -- -- --- Totals 42 7 10 7 Totals 42 8 13 8 A-Pinch Ran For Valbuena In 4th Inning B-Pinch Hit For Grimm In 5th Inning C-Pinch Hit For Leake In 5th Inning D-Subbed Defensively (C ) For Mesoraco In 6th Inning E-Pinch Hit For Simon In 7th Inning F-Pinch Hit For Russell In 8th Inning G-Pinch Hit For Hoover In 8th Inning H-Pinch Ran For Frazier In 8th Inning I-Pinch Hit For Lecure In 9th Inning J-Pinch Hit For Cingrani In 11th Inning INJURY: Luis Valbuena INJURED (for 1 more game) in 4th inning INJURY: Devin Mesoraco INJURED (for 0 more games) in 5th inning Cubs............ 1 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 7 10 0 Reds............ 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 - 8 13 0 Cubs (12-23) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA J.Grimm 4 5 4 4 0 4 2 56 9.00 P.Strop 0 2/3 0 0 0 3 1 0 25 1.08 H.Rondon HOLD(3rd) 2 1 1 1 1 4 0 21 6.61 J.Russell HOLD(1st) 0 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 9.60 K.Gregg BS(2nd) 1 2 1 1 2 0 0 30 4.76 M.Bowden 1 2/3 2 1 1 4 2 0 36 2.61 M.Guerrier LOSS(0-1) 0 2/3 2 1 1 1 0 0 21 2.25 Totals 10 1/3 13 8 8 11 11 2 Reds (18-17) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA M.Leake 5 7 6 6 2 3 3 88 7.17 A.Simon 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 28 2.81 J.Hoover 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 16 9.45 S.Lecure 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 14 2.08 T.Cingrani WIN(1-1) 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 33 2.30 Totals 11 10 7 7 5 7 3 ATTENDANCE- 19,890 DATE- TIME- Day UMPIRES- Paul Emmel, Chris Conroy, Gary Darling, Jerry Meals T- 3:22 LEFT ON BASE- Cubs: 8 Reds:13 DOUBLE PLAYS- Cubs: 1 Reds: 1 DOUBLES- D.Barney(8th), S.Choo(9th), Z.Cozart(11th), J.Votto(6th), J.Bruce(4th), T.Frazier(6th), C.Miller(1st), M.Leake HOME RUNS- D.Dejesus(3rd), D.Navarro(3rd), R.Sweeney(6th), Z.Cozart(3rd), J.Votto(7th) RBIs- D.Dejesus(5th), D.Navarro-3(10th), R.Sweeney-2(14th), D.Barney(4th), Z.Cozart-3(19th), J.Votto-3(20th), T.Frazier(12th), C.Miller(1st) WALKS- D.Dejesus-2, D.Navarro, N.Schierholtz, D.Barney, S.Choo-3, Z.Cozart, J.Votto-2, J.Bruce, X.Paul, R.Hanigan, C.Miller, J.Hannahan HIT BY PITCH- L.Valbuena STRIKE OUTS- D.Navarro-2, B.Bogusevic, D.Barney, J.Grimm, D.Sappelt, M.Bowden, S.Choo, Z.Cozart, B.Phillips, J.Bruce-2, T.Frazier-2, C.Heisey, C.Miller, B.Hamilton, R.Ludwick GIDP- L.Valbuena, D.Mesoraco WILD PITCHES- M.Bowden 2-out RBI- J.Votto-3, R.Sweeney, D.Barney RLISP 2-out- D.Barney-2, B.Phillips-4, S.Castro, Z.Cozart-2, X.Paul, M.Bowden TEAM RISP- Cubs: 2 for 6 Reds: 5 for 15 The Cincinnati Reds nipped the Chicago (NL) Cubs in 11 innings 8 to 7 at Great American Bpk in a hard fought contest. The game was deadlocked at 6 after nine full innings. Cincinnati won the game in the 11th inning. After an out was recorded, Chris Heisey delivered a base-hit. Ryan Hanigan came to the plate and drew a walk. Corky Miller then doubled resulting in an exciting win for Cincinnati and a raucous post-game celebration by the home town fans. A wild and woolly affair, this game saw the lead change 5 times. Tony Cingrani(1-1) allowed 1 run in 2 innings, and picked up the victory. The loss was charged to Matt Guerrier(0-1) in relief. He gave up 2 hits and 1 walk in 2/3 of an inning.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
▼
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
-
▼
March 2017
(24)
- CHI 36 vs. CIN 36
- CHI 35 vs. CIN 35
- CIN 34 vs. STL 36
- CIN 33 vs. NY 36
- NY 35 vs. CIN 32
- MIA 36 vs. ATL 36
- MIA 35 vs. ATL 35
- SF 36 vs. MIA 34
- SF 35 vs. CIN 31
- CIN 30 vs. CHI 34
- CIN 29 vs. CHI 33
- STL 35 vs. MIA 33
- MIA 32 vs. STL 34
- CIN 28 vs. SD 36
- SD 35 vs. CIN 27
- STL 33 vs. MIL 36
- STL 32 vs. MIL 35
- MIL 34 vs. STL 31
- MIL 33 vs. STL 30
- NY 34 vs. ATL 34
- ATL 33 vs. ARZ 36
- ARZ 35 vs. SF 34
- ARZ 34 vs. SF 33
- PHI 35 vs. ARZ 33
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Sunday, March 26, 2017
CHI 35 vs. CIN 35
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment