BOXSCORE: 2012 Miami Marlins At 2012 Cincinnati Reds 5/28/2012
Marlins AB R H RBI AVG Reds AB R H RBI AVG
E.Bonifacio CF 5 0 1 0 .323 Z.Cozart SS 4 1 2 1 .313
J.Reyes SS 5 0 0 0 .265 J.Bruce RF 4 1 1 0 .266
L.Morrison 1B 3 0 0 0 .255 B.Phillips 2B 4 1 1 1 .273
G.Stanton RF 3 0 0 0 .171 J.Votto 1B 4 0 1 2 .309
G.Dobbs 3B 4 1 1 0 .254 S.Rolen 3B 4 1 1 0 .212
J.Ruggiano LF 4 2 2 0 .299 R.Ludwick LF 3 0 1 0 .357
R.Brantly C 4 0 2 0 .300 A-C.Heisey PR,LF 0 0 0 0 .250
D.Solano 2B 4 0 2 2 .267 R.Hanigan C 4 0 1 1 .242
C.Zambrano P 3 0 1 1 .143 D.Stubbs CF 2 0 0 0 .254
S.Cishek P 0 0 0 0 .000 J.Cueto P 1 1 0 0 .200
D-A.Kearns PH 1 0 0 0 .224 L.Ondrusek P 0 0 0 0 ----
B-X.Paul PH 1 0 0 0 .417
S.Lecure P 0 0 0 0 .000
C-T.Frazier PH 1 0 0 0 .158
A.Chapman P 0 0 0 0 .000
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 36 3 9 3 Totals 32 5 8 5
A-Pinch Ran For Ludwick In 6th Inning
B-Pinch Hit For Ondrusek In 7th Inning
C-Pinch Hit For Lecure In 8th Inning
D-Pinch Hit For Cishek In 9th Inning
Marlins......... 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 - 3 9 3
Reds............ 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 - 5 8 0
Marlins (7-16) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
C.Zambrano LOSS(1-1) 7 1/3 8 5 1 2 5 0 121 2.35
S.Cishek 0 2/3 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 5.82
Totals 8 8 5 1 3 5 0
Reds (11-6) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
J.Cueto WIN(3-2) 6 1/3 9 3 3 0 5 0 96 4.05
L.Ondrusek HOLD(2nd) 0 2/3 0 0 0 2 0 0 13 0.00
S.Lecure HOLD(1st) 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0.69
A.Chapman SAVE(4th) 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 1.35
Totals 9 9 3 3 2 9 0
ATTENDANCE- 38,952 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Tim Tschida, Jeff Nelson, Bill Welke, Chris Guccione
T- 3:05
LEFT ON BASE- Marlins: 8 Reds: 7
DOUBLE PLAYS- Marlins: 1 Reds: 0
ERRORS- G.Dobbs-2, C.Zambrano
DOUBLES- Z.Cozart(5th), J.Bruce(3rd)
TRIPLES- E.Bonifacio(2nd)
RBIs- D.Solano-2(11th), C.Zambrano, Z.Cozart(8th), B.Phillips(7th),
J.Votto-2(8th), R.Hanigan(3rd)
SACRIFICE HITS- J.Cueto
WALKS- L.Morrison, G.Stanton, C.Heisey, D.Stubbs-2
STRIKE OUTS- E.Bonifacio, G.Stanton-2, G.Dobbs, J.Ruggiano, R.Brantly-2,
D.Solano, C.Zambrano, Z.Cozart, J.Bruce, J.Votto, R.Ludwick,
X.Paul
GIDP- T.Frazier
2-out RBI- C.Zambrano
RLISP 2-out- E.Bonifacio-2, Z.Cozart, D.Stubbs, G.Dobbs-2, B.Phillips
TEAM RISP- Marlins: 3 for 8 Reds: 4 for 9
In a tight game it was the Cincinnati Reds 5, the floundering Miami Marlins 3
at Great American Bpk.
Johnny Cueto(3-2) had a steady outing. He was reached for 9 hits and no walks
in 6 and 1/3 innings. Aroldis Chapman relieved and was untouched by Miami as
he recorded the save, his 4th.
Carlos Zambrano(1-1) ended up with the loss. He pitched 7 and 1/3 innings and
surrendered 8 hits and 2 walks.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
▼
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
-
▼
February 2015
(53)
- ATL 19 vs. PHI 24
- ATL 18 vs. PHI 23
- WAS 18 vs. ATL 17
- WAS 17 vs. ATL 16
- ATL 15 vs. MIA 27
- ATL 14 vs. MIA 26
- SD 19 vs. MIA 25
- CIN 18 vs. MIA 24
- MIA 23 vs. CIN 17
- LA 26 vs. CHI 26
- CHI 25 vs. LA 25
- PIT 26 vs. COL 24
- LA 24 vs. SD 18
- SF 18 vs. COL 23
- SF 17 vs. ATL 13
- ATL 12 vs. SF 16
- SD 17 vs. STL 23
- STL 22 vs. SD 16
- STL 21 vs. CIN 16
- STL 20 vs. CIN 15
- LA 23 vs. MIA 22
- MIA 21 vs. LA 22
- NY 22 vs. ATL 11
- LA 21 vs. ATL 10
- ATL 9 vs. LA 20
- ATL 8 vs. PIT 25
- PIT 24 vs. ATL 7
- CHI 24 vs. ATL 6
- ATL 5 vs. CHI 23
- ATL 4 vs. WAS 16
- ARZ 24 vs. SD 15
- ARZ 23 vs. SD 14
- CIN 14 vs. NY 21
- ATL 3 vs. WAS 15
- PHI 22 vs. ATL 2
- PHI 21 vs. ATL 1
- PHI 20 vs. NY 20
- PHI 19 vs. NY 19
- MIA 20 vs. MIL 24
- MIL 23 vs. MIA 19
- CIN 13 vs. MIL 22
- CIN 12 vs. MIL 21
- MIL 20 vs. SD 13
- SD 12 vs. MIL 19
- MIA 18 vs. STL 19
- STL 18 vs. MIA 17
- COL 22 vs. SF 15
- COL 21 vs. SF 14
- CHI 22 vs. SF 13
- LA 19 vs. SD 11
- LA 18 vs. CIN 11
- CHI 21 vs. SD 10
- SD 9 vs. CHI 20
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Saturday, February 21, 2015
MIA 23 vs. CIN 17
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment