BOXSCORE: 2013 San Diego Padres At 2013 Chicago (NL) Cubs 6/30/2013 Padres AB R H RBI AVG Cubs AB R H RBI AVG E.Cabrera SS 5 1 1 0 .202 D.Dejesus CF 4 1 0 0 .217 A.Amarista CF 5 2 2 0 .185 S.Castro SS 5 1 1 3 .217 C.Headley 3B 5 0 2 2 .161 D.Navarro C 4 2 2 0 .224 C.Quentin LF 4 1 0 1 .308 A.Rizzo 1B 3 2 2 2 .216 Y.Alonso 1B 3 1 1 0 .346 R.Sweeney LF 4 2 2 1 .333 J.Gyorko 2B 3 0 1 0 .226 B.Bogusevic RF 4 0 1 2 .257 W.Venable RF 4 0 3 1 .256 L.Valbuena 3B 3 1 1 1 .237 N.Hundley C 4 0 0 0 .240 D.Barney 2B 3 0 0 0 .159 A.Cashner P 2 0 0 0 .222 E.Jackson P 1 0 1 0 .333 C-K.Blanks PH 1 0 1 0 .333 A-N.Schierholtz PH 1 1 1 2 .253 D.Thayer P 0 0 0 0 .000 B.Parker P 0 0 0 0 ---- D-T.Medica PH 1 0 0 0 .238 B-W.Castillo PH 1 0 0 0 .235 A.Bass P 0 0 0 0 ---- J.Russell P 0 0 0 0 .000 P.Strop P 1 1 1 01.000 M.Bowden P 0 0 0 0 ---- -- -- -- --- -- -- -- --- Totals 37 5 11 4 Totals 34 11 12 11 A-Pinch Hit For Jackson In 4th Inning B-Pinch Hit For Parker In 5th Inning C-Pinch Hit For Cashner In 6th Inning D-Pinch Hit For Thayer In 8th Inning Padres.......... 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 5 11 0 Cubs............ 0 2 2 2 2 0 0 3 - 11 12 1 Padres (10-21) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA A.Cashner LOSS(1-3) 5 10 8 8 3 2 2 110 4.78 D.Thayer 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 24 4.38 A.Bass 1 2 3 3 2 0 1 26 27.00 Totals 8 12 11 11 5 4 3 Cubs (11-20) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA E.Jackson 4 7 5 4 1 3 0 76 5.73 B.Parker 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 13 2.18 J.Russell WIN(2-1) 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 17 10.38 P.Strop HOLD(1st) 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 19 1.38 M.Bowden 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 11 2.08 Totals 9 11 5 4 1 7 0 ATTENDANCE- 40,591 DATE- TIME- Day UMPIRES- Paul Nauert, Doug Eddings, Dana Demuth, Angel Hernandez T- 3:20 LEFT ON BASE- Padres: 7 Cubs: 6 DOUBLE PLAYS- Padres: 1 Cubs: 0 ERRORS- L.Valbuena DOUBLES- J.Gyorko(5th), W.Venable(4th), D.Navarro(3rd), R.Sweeney(5th), P.Strop HOME RUNS- S.Castro(5th), A.Rizzo(4th), N.Schierholtz(5th) RBIs- C.Headley-2(7th), C.Quentin(17th), W.Venable(7th), S.Castro-3(13th), A.Rizzo-2(10th), R.Sweeney(12th), B.Bogusevic-2(10th), L.Valbuena(2nd), N.Schierholtz-2(18th) STOLEN BASES- A.Amarista(1st) SACRIFICE HITS- D.Barney WALKS- J.Gyorko, D.Dejesus, A.Rizzo-2, R.Sweeney, L.Valbuena HIT BY PITCH- Y.Alonso, D.Navarro STRIKE OUTS- A.Amarista, C.Headley, C.Quentin, Y.Alonso, J.Gyorko, A.Cashner, T.Medica, D.Dejesus, A.Rizzo, R.Sweeney, W.Castillo GIDP- B.Bogusevic WILD PITCHES- A.Cashner 2-out RBI- C.Headley, S.Castro-3 RLISP 2-out- N.Hundley-2, D.Dejesus, A.Cashner, W.Castillo, A.Amarista, T.Medica, R.Sweeney TEAM RISP- Padres: 4 for 14 Cubs: 7 for 12 Anthony Rizzo slammed a homerun and had 2 RBI at Wrigley Field where the Chicago (NL) Cubs beat the San Diego Padres 11 to 5. Chicago (NL) took the lead for keeps in the bottom of the 4th inning when they tallied 2 runs on 1 hit. The big moment was provided by Nate Schierholtz who made the Chicago (NL) fans a happy lot when he lifted one out of the park for a two run home run. Chicago (NL) totaled 12 hits on the afternoon. James Russell(2-1) got credit for the victory, pitching 2 innings and allowing no runs. The losing pitcher was Andrew Cashner(1-3). He was touched for 10 hits and 3 walks in 5 innings.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
▼
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
-
▼
February 2017
(37)
- ATL 32 vs. CIN 26
- CIN 25 vs. ATL 31
- SF 32 vs. SD 34
- SF 31 vs. SD 33
- COL 36 vs. STL 29
- STL 28 vs. COL 35
- ATL 30 vs. PHI 35
- CHI 32 vs. SD 32
- SD 31 vs. CHI 31
- SD 30 vs. MIL 32
- MIL 31 vs. SD 29
- SD 28 vs. MIA 31
- MIA 30 vs. SD 27
- ATL 29 vs. PHI 34
- PHI 33 vs. ATL 28
- PHI 32 vs. STL 27
- STL 26 vs. PHI 31
- MIL 30 vs. CIN 24
- MIL 29 vs. CIN 23
- NY 33 vs. MIA 29
- MIL 28 vs. WAS 36
- WAS 35 vs. MIL 27
- WAS 34 vs. CIN 22
- CIN 21 vs. WAS 33
- PIT 36 vs. MIL 26
- SF 30 vs. STL 25
- ATL 27 vs. STL 24
- STL 23 vs. ATL 26
- PIT 35 vs. MIL 25
- MIL 24 vs. PIT 34
- MIL 23 vs. PIT 33
- ATL 25 vs. NY 32
- ATL 24 vs. NY 31
- WAS 32 vs. NY 30
- WAS 31 vs. NY 29
- ARZ 32 vs. WAS 30
- ARZ 31 vs. PHI 30
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Sunday, February 26, 2017
SD 31 vs. CHI 31
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment