BOXSCORE: 2012 Atlanta Braves At 2012 New York (NL) Mets 6/9/2012
Braves AB R H RBI AVG Mets AB R H RBI AVG
M.Bourn CF 5 0 1 0 .229 R.Cedeno 2B 5 1 1 0 .345
M.Prado LF 4 1 0 0 .308 D.Murphy 1B 5 0 1 0 .289
J.Heyward RF 5 1 0 0 .230 D.Wright 3B 2 1 2 1 .358
C.Jones 3B 4 1 1 2 .283 S.Hairston RF 5 0 3 1 .400
F.Freeman 1B 4 1 1 0 .301 L.Duda LF 4 0 0 0 .238
D.Uggla 2B 3 1 2 0 .229 R.Tejada SS 4 0 0 0 .233
B.McCann C 3 1 2 2 .250 A.Torres CF 3 0 1 0 .284
A.Simmons SS 1 0 0 0 .373 M.Nickeas C 4 0 1 0 .235
A-P.Janish SS 3 0 1 1 .040 D.Gee P 2 0 0 0 .000
P.Maholm P 4 0 0 0 .143 B-J.Turner PH 1 0 0 0 .328
C.Kimbrel P 0 0 0 0 .333 J.Rauch P 0 0 0 0 ----
C-J.Thole PH 1 0 0 0 .165
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 36 6 8 5 Totals 36 2 9 2
A-Subbed Defensively (SS) For Simmons In 2nd Inning
B-Pinch Hit For Gee In 6th Inning
C-Pinch Hit For Rauch In 9th Inning
INJURY: Andrelton Simmons INJURED (for 1 more game) in 2nd inning
Braves.......... 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 0 - 6 8 1
Mets............ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 2 9 3
Braves (13-14) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
P.Maholm WIN(5-2) 8 2/3 9 2 2 5 10 1 149 2.08
C.Kimbrel SAVE(9th) 0 1/3 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0.00
Totals 9 9 2 2 5 11 1
Mets (14-10) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
D.Gee LOSS(0-1) 6 5 5 1 2 4 2 107 2.25
J.Rauch 3 3 1 1 0 2 0 43 3.80
Totals 9 8 6 2 2 6 2
ATTENDANCE- 39,558 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Chris Guccione, Tim Tschida, Jeff Nelson, Bill Welke
T- 2:56
LEFT ON BASE- Braves: 6 Mets:12
DOUBLE PLAYS- Braves: 0 Mets: 0
ERRORS- P.Maholm, D.Murphy, R.Tejada, D.Gee
DOUBLES- D.Uggla(7th), D.Murphy(6th), S.Hairston(9th)
HOME RUNS- C.Jones(7th), B.McCann(5th), D.Wright(3rd)
RBIs- C.Jones-2(19th), B.McCann-2(15th), P.Janish(1st), D.Wright(12th),
S.Hairston(14th)
STOLEN BASES- M.Prado(1st)
CAUGHT STEALING- D.Uggla
SACRIFICE HITS- M.Prado
WALKS- D.Uggla, B.McCann, D.Wright-3, L.Duda, A.Torres
STRIKE OUTS- M.Bourn, C.Jones, F.Freeman, P.Janish, P.Maholm-2, R.Cedeno,
D.Murphy-2, S.Hairston-2, L.Duda-3, A.Torres, M.Nickeas, D.Gee
2-out RBI- D.Wright, P.Janish, S.Hairston
RLISP 2-out- C.Jones, D.Gee, M.Bourn, L.Duda-2, P.Maholm
TEAM RISP- Braves: 3 for 10 Mets: 1 for 6
WEB GEMS- Bot 1st: Brian McCann blocked the plate, saving a run!
Paul Maholm reeled off a total of 10 strikeouts and Brian McCann blasted a
homerun and had 2 RBI at Citi Field as the Atlanta Braves beat the New York
(NL) Mets 6 to 2.
Maholm(5-2) had a solid outing for Atlanta. He went 8 and 2/3 innings
surrendering 9 hits and 5 walks. Atlanta finished with 8 hits in the
victory.
Craig Kimbrel earned his 9th save. The losing pitcher was Dillon Gee(0-1).
Maholm was humble when questioned about his performance, 'Well, I felt pretty
confident in my pitches this afternoon. But, I had great support behind me
and I just threw what was called. That was an extremely well called game!'
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
▼
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
-
▼
March 2015
(54)
- PHI 29 vs. COL 31
- CHI 33 vs. STL 31
- WAS 27 vs. STL 30
- ARZ 30 vs. ATL 30
- ATL 29 vs. ARZ 29
- NY 29 vs. CHI 32
- CHI 31 vs. NY 28
- ARZ 28 vs. WAS 26
- WAS 25 vs. ARZ 27
- LA 34 vs. SF 23
- LA 33 vs. SF 22
- PIT 34 vs. MIL 34
- PIT 33 vs. MIL 33
- MIL 32 vs. PIT 32
- MIL 31 vs. PIT 31
- LA 32 vs. MIL 30
- MIL 29 vs. LA 31
- WAS 24 vs. PHI 28
- COL 30 vs. PHI 27
- COL 29 vs. NY 27
- NY 26 vs. COL 28
- NY 25 vs. ATL 28
- ATL 27 vs. NY 24
- ATL 26 vs. NY 23
- PIT 30 vs. PHI 26
- PHI 25 vs. PIT 29
- SF 21 vs. STL 29
- STL 28 vs. SF 20
- PIT 28 vs. CHI 30
- PIT 27 vs. CHI 29
- CIN 29 vs. WAS 23
- ATL 25 vs. SD 25
- SD 24 vs. ATL 24
- CIN 28 vs. CHI 28
- ATL 23 vs. CIN 27
- CIN 26 vs. ATL 22
- COL 27 vs. WAS 22
- WAS 21 vs. COL 26
- CIN 25 vs. STL 27
- CIN 24 vs. STL 26
- LA 30 vs. WAS 20
- WAS 19 vs. LA 29
- ATL 21 vs. MIL 28
- MIL 27 vs. ATL 20
- SF 19 vs. COL 25
- SD 23 vs. LA 28
- SD 22 vs. LA 27
- STL 25 vs. MIL 26
- STL 24 vs. MIL 25
- CIN 23 vs. CHI 27
- CIN 22 vs. SD 21
- SD 20 vs. CIN 21
- ARZ 26 vs. CIN 20
- CIN 19 vs. ARZ 25
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Wednesday, March 18, 2015
ATL 27 vs. NY 24
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment