BOXSCORE: 2013 Chicago (AL) Whitesox At 2013 Minnesota Twins 5/30/2013 Whitesox AB R H RBI AVG Twins AB R H RBI AVG A.Garcia RF 0 0 0 0 .000 B.Dozier 2B 3 0 0 0 .240 A-J.Danks PR,CF 3 1 3 0 .304 J.Mauer C 4 1 1 1 .274 D.Viciedo LF,RF 5 0 0 0 .326 R.Doumit RF 4 0 1 0 .260 A.De Aza CF,LF 2 0 1 0 .344 J.Willingham DH 3 1 0 0 .100 B-M.Semien PR,LF 2 1 0 0 .000 T.Plouffe 3B 4 0 3 0 .183 A.Dunn DH 5 0 1 2 .237 O.Arcia LF 4 0 0 1 .133 P.Konerko 1B 5 0 1 1 .272 J.Morneau 1B 4 0 0 0 .276 C.Gillaspie 3B 4 0 0 0 .211 C.Thomas CF 4 0 0 0 .100 A.Ramirez SS 4 0 0 0 .270 P.Florimon SS 3 0 0 0 .189 G.Beckham 2B 4 1 3 0 .276 T.Flowers C 4 2 3 2 .211 -- -- -- --- -- -- -- --- Totals 38 5 12 5 Totals 33 2 5 2 A-Pinch Ran For Garcia In 1st Inning B-Pinch Ran For De Aza In 5th Inning INJURY: Avisail Garcia INJURED (for 0 more games) in 1st inning INJURY: Alejandro De Aza INJURED (for 0 more games) in 5th inning Whitesox........ 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 - 5 12 1 Twins........... 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 2 5 0 Whitesox (12-13) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA C.Sale WIN(3-3) 9 5 2 2 1 17 1 139 2.42 Totals 9 5 2 2 1 17 1 Twins (11-16) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA M.Pelfrey LOSS(1-4) 4 1/3 8 5 5 0 1 1 83 4.40 A.Swarzak 4 2/3 4 0 0 1 4 0 62 4.35 Totals 9 12 5 5 1 5 1 ATTENDANCE- 19,788 DATE- TIME- Day UMPIRES- Paul Schrieber, Chad Fairchild, Jeff Kellogg, Eric Cooper T- 2:32 LEFT ON BASE- Whitesox: 9 Twins: 6 DOUBLE PLAYS- Whitesox: 0 Twins: 1 ERRORS- C.Sale DOUBLES- G.Beckham(5th) HOME RUNS- T.Flowers(4th), J.Mauer(1st) RBIs- A.Dunn-2(17th), P.Konerko(17th), T.Flowers-2(8th), J.Mauer(4th), O.Arcia(4th) STOLEN BASES- J.Danks(4th) WALKS- J.Danks, B.Dozier HIT BY PITCH- A.Garcia, A.De Aza, J.Willingham STRIKE OUTS- D.Viciedo-2, A.Dunn, A.Ramirez, T.Flowers, B.Dozier, J.Mauer, R.Doumit-2, J.Willingham-3, T.Plouffe, O.Arcia, J.Morneau-2, C.Thomas-4, P.Florimon-2 GIDP- C.Gillaspie 2-out RBI- T.Flowers-2, J.Mauer RLISP 2-out- P.Konerko, T.Plouffe, M.Semien-2, D.Viciedo TEAM RISP- Whitesox: 3 for 10 Twins: 0 for 3 WEB GEMS- Top 7th: Brian Dozier robbed Paul Konerko of a base hit. Chris Sale whiffed 17 batters at Target Field where the Chicago (AL) Whitesox beat the Minnesota Twins by the score of 5 to 2. Sale(3-3) was simply too much for the Minnesota batters. He allowed only 5 hits and 1 walk in 9 innings. Chicago (AL) had a total of 12 hits for the game. Mike Pelfrey(1-4) was the losing pitcher. Chicago (AL) knocked him around a bit, as he gave up 5 runs in 4 and 1/3 innings. 'We didn't have a whole lot of chances today,' Lee Michaels said. 'Sale just was too much for our guys.'
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
▼
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
-
▼
October 2017
(65)
- BOS 30 vs. TBY 30
- BOS 29 vs. TBY 29
- KC 30 vs. MIN 32
- KC 29 vs. MIN 31
- LAA 30 vs. NY 18
- NY 17 vs. LAA 29
- KC 28 vs. TOR 32
- HOU 34 vs. KC 27
- KC 26 vs. HOU 33
- DET 32 vs. KC 25
- KC 24 vs. CHI 34
- KC 23 vs. CHI 33
- CHI 32 vs. KC 22
- CHI 31 vs. KC 21
- LAA 28 vs. SEA 31
- LAA 27 vs. SEA 30
- LAA 26 vs. TOR 31
- TOR 30 vs. LAA 25
- MIN 30 vs. CHI 30
- MIN 29 vs. CHI 29
- BAL 28 vs. NY 16
- BAL 27 vs. NY 15
- TEX 24 vs. HOU 32
- TEX 23 vs. HOU 31
- TEX 22 vs. DET 31
- DET 30 vs. TEX 21
- SEA 29 vs. TEX 20
- CHI 28 vs. MIN 28
- NY 14 vs. CHI 27
- CHI 26 vs. NY 13
- CHI 25 vs. MIN 27
- TBY 28 vs. DET 29
- DET 28 vs. TBY 27
- SEA 28 vs. TOR 29
- TOR 28 vs. SEA 27
- BAL 26 vs. BOS 28
- BAL 25 vs. BOS 27
- BOS 26 vs. BAL 24
- BOS 25 vs. BAL 23
- CHI 24 vs. SEA 26
- SEA 25 vs. CHI 23
- SEA 24 vs. BAL 22
- BAL 21 vs. SEA 23
- DET 27 vs. KC 20
- SEA 22 vs. KC 19
- KC 18 vs. SEA 21
- SEA 20 vs. CLE 25
- SEA 19 vs. BOS 24
- BOS 23 vs. SEA 18
- MIN 26 vs. SEA 17
- SEA 16 vs. MIN 25
- OAK 28 vs. SEA 15
- OAK 27 vs. SEA 14
- SEA 13 vs. OAK 26
- SEA 12 vs. OAK 25
- SEA 11 vs. HOU 30
- SEA 10 vs. HOU 29
- HOU 28 vs. SEA 9
- HOU 27 vs. SEA 8
- MIN 24 vs. TOR 27
- TOR 26 vs. MIN 23
- LAA 24 vs. BOS 22
- BOS 21 vs. LAA 23
- OAK 24 vs. CLE 24
- CLE 23 vs. OAK 23
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
►
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Thursday, October 19, 2017
CHI 25 vs. MIN 27
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment