BOXSCORE: 2011 Cleveland Indians At 2011 Boston Redsox 6/2/2011
Indians AB R H RBI AVG Redsox AB R H RBI AVG
S.Choo RF 4 0 0 0 .208 J.Ellsbury CF 4 0 1 0 .363
T.Hafner DH 4 0 2 0 .207 D.Pedroia 2B 4 2 2 1 .283
M.Laporta 1B 4 0 0 0 .200 A.Gonzalez 1B 3 0 0 0 .252
A.Cabrera SS 4 0 1 0 .343 K.Youkilis 3B 3 0 0 0 .200
G.Sizemore CF 3 0 0 0 .205 D.Ortiz DH 3 1 2 0 .339
M.Brantley LF 3 0 0 0 .200 C.Crawford LF 3 0 2 1 .325
C.Santana C 3 1 1 1 .265 J.Varitek C 3 0 0 0 .278
L.Valbuena 2B 2 0 0 0 .000 M.Aviles RF 3 0 0 0 .275
A-A.Everett PH,2B 1 0 0 0 .000 M.Scutaro SS 3 0 0 0 .278
J.Hannahan 3B 2 0 0 0 .198
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 30 1 4 1 Totals 29 3 7 2
A-Pinch Hit For Valbuena In 8th Inning
Indians......... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 4 1
Redsox.......... 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 - 3 7 0
Indians (16-12) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
F.Carmona LOSS(1-2) 7 7 3 2 1 1 1 99 2.78
T.Sipp 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 3.79
Totals 8 7 3 2 1 2 1
Redsox (17-12) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
T.Wakefield WIN(1-0) 9 4 1 1 1 9 1 109 1.00
Totals 9 4 1 1 1 9 1
ATTENDANCE- 32,788 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- John Hirschbeck, Wally Bell, Laz Diaz, Scott Barry
T- 2:14
LEFT ON BASE- Indians: 3 Redsox: 3
DOUBLE PLAYS- Indians: 0 Redsox: 1
ERRORS- C.Santana
DOUBLES- T.Hafner(3rd)
TRIPLES- C.Crawford(1st)
HOME RUNS- C.Santana(5th), D.Pedroia(3rd)
RBIs- C.Santana(15th), D.Pedroia(11th), C.Crawford(8th)
STOLEN BASES- A.Cabrera(3rd), D.Pedroia(5th), C.Crawford(3rd)
CAUGHT STEALING- J.Ellsbury, C.Crawford
WALKS- J.Hannahan, A.Gonzalez
STRIKE OUTS- S.Choo, T.Hafner, M.Laporta, A.Cabrera, G.Sizemore-2, C.Santana,
A.Everett, J.Hannahan, A.Gonzalez, M.Aviles
GIDP- S.Choo
WILD PITCHES- F.Carmona
2-out RBI- D.Pedroia
RLISP 2-out- A.Cabrera, M.Scutaro, G.Sizemore, M.Aviles
WEB GEMS- Top 4th: Jacoby Ellsbury robbed Travis Hafner of a Homerun!
Second baseman Dustin Pedroia went yard and Tim Wakefield went 9 strong
innings as the Boston Redsox outscored the Cleveland Indians 3 to
1.
Wakefield(1-0) simply dominated Cleveland. He didn't allow much, just 4 hits
and 1 walk in 9 innings. Cleveland went down without a fight in the 9th.
Fausto Carmona(1-2) ended up with the loss. He pitched 7 innings allowing 7
hits and 1 walk. 'Wakefield was the man today,' Andy Virostek said. 'He had
just about every pitch working.'
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
▼
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
-
▼
June 2014
(62)
- BAL 33 vs. TBY 36
- OAK 33 vs. TEX 34
- TEX 33 vs. OAK 32
- TEX 32 vs. OAK 31
- CLE 36 vs. DET 33
- CLE 35 vs. SEA 29
- SEA 28 vs. CLE 34
- TBY 35 vs. CLE 33
- CLE 32 vs. TBY 34
- DET 32 vs. OAK 30
- DET 31 vs. KC 36
- DET 30 vs. KC 35
- DET 29 vs. BOS 34
- BOS 33 vs. DET 28
- BOS 32 vs. CLE 31
- BAL 32 vs. TBY 33
- SEA 27 vs. BOS 31
- BOS 30 vs. SEA 26
- CLE 30 vs. DET 27
- DET 26 vs. CLE 29
- TEX 31 vs. LAA 36
- TEX 30 vs. LAA 35
- LAA 34 vs. TEX 29
- LAA 33 vs. TEX 28
- KC 34 vs. MIN 34
- KC 33 vs. MIN 33
- CHI 32 vs. KC 32
- CHI 31 vs. KC 31
- KC 30 vs. CHI 30
- KC 29 vs. CHI 29
- CLE 28 vs. BOS 29
- OAK 29 vs. TEX 27
- TEX 26 vs. HOU 30
- TEX 25 vs. TBY 32
- TBY 31 vs. TEX 24
- OAK 28 vs. HOU 29
- OAK 27 vs. HOU 28
- BOS 28 vs. NYY 34
- BOS 27 vs. NYY 33
- NYY 32 vs. BOS 26
- NYY 31 vs. BOS 25
- CLE 27 vs. TOR 34
- TOR 33 vs. CLE 26
- NYY 30 vs. TOR 32
- TOR 31 vs. NYY 29
- KC 28 vs. LAA 32
- LAA 31 vs. KC 27
- LAA 30 vs. OAK 26
- DET 25 vs. SEA 25
- SEA 24 vs. DET 24
- SEA 23 vs. NYY 28
- TOR 30 vs. NYY 27
- NYY 26 vs. TOR 29
- LAA 29 vs. TOR 28
- TOR 27 vs. LAA 28
- DET 23 vs. TBY 30
- TBY 29 vs. DET 22
- TBY 28 vs. SEA 22
- MIN 32 vs. CLE 25
- MIN 31 vs. CLE 24
- CLE 23 vs. MIN 30
- CLE 22 vs. MIN 29
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Saturday, June 14, 2014
CLE 28 vs. BOS 29
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment