BOXSCORE: 2011 Texas Rangers At 2011 Oakland A's 6/9/2011
Rangers AB R H RBI AVG A's AB R H RBI AVG
I.Kinsler 2B 4 0 2 0 .279 C.Crisp CF 4 2 2 0 .289
M.Young DH 4 0 1 0 .320 D.Barton 1B 4 1 2 2 .245
M.Napoli C 3 0 0 0 .421 S.Sizemore 3B 4 1 1 1 .274
J.Hamilton LF 4 0 0 0 .350 J.Willingham LF 4 0 2 1 .272
A.Beltre 3B 4 1 1 0 .344 H.Matsui DH 4 0 1 0 .182
J.Borbon CF 4 1 1 0 .200 D.Dejesus RF 4 0 0 0 .266
D.Murphy RF 3 0 2 2 .333 K.Suzuki C 4 0 1 0 .248
E.Andrus SS 2 0 0 0 .259 C.Pennington SS 3 0 0 0 .220
M.Moreland 1B 3 0 0 0 .274 J.Weeks 2B 3 0 0 0 .179
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 31 2 7 2 Totals 34 4 9 4
Rangers......... 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 2 7 1
A's............. 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 - 4 9 0
Rangers (21-11) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
C.Wilson 7 6 2 1 0 9 0 107 2.05
M.Gonzalez L(0-2) BS(1st) 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 5 1.64
M.Adams 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 22 1.59
Totals 8 9 4 3 0 9 0
A's (16-15) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
B.McCarthy WIN(4-1) 8 7 2 2 2 3 0 104 2.70
A.Bailey SAVE(7th) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0.00
Totals 9 7 2 2 2 3 0
ATTENDANCE- 12,483 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Paul Schrieber, Chad Fairchild, Joe West, Angel Hernandez
T- 2:41
LEFT ON BASE- Rangers: 4 A's: 6
DOUBLE PLAYS- Rangers: 0 A's: 3
ERRORS- J.Hamilton
DOUBLES- I.Kinsler(11th), A.Beltre(12th), D.Murphy(4th), C.Crisp-2(11th),
D.Barton-2(7th), S.Sizemore(11th), J.Willingham-2(7th), H.Matsui(3rd)
RBIs- D.Murphy-2(12th), D.Barton-2(13th), S.Sizemore(15th), J.Willingham(26th)
STOLEN BASES- J.Borbon(1st)
WALKS- M.Napoli, E.Andrus
STRIKE OUTS- M.Young, J.Hamilton, M.Moreland, D.Barton, S.Sizemore,
J.Willingham-2, H.Matsui-2, D.Dejesus, K.Suzuki, C.Pennington
GIDP- M.Napoli-2, M.Moreland
2-out RBI- D.Barton
RLISP 2-out- M.Moreland, K.Suzuki-3, A.Beltre, S.Sizemore, D.Barton
Daric Barton hit 2 doubles and had 2 RBI as the Oakland A's beat the Texas
Rangers by a score of 4 to 2.
Oakland scored the decisive runs in a big 8th inning with 3 runs using 3 hits.
Coco Crisp kicked off the action when he reached on an error. Barton came
to the plate and doubled. Scott Sizemore then doubled. Josh Willingham
followed and he doubled. Andrew Bailey pitched a perfect ninth and was
credited with his 7th save.
Brandon McCarthy(4-1) allowed 2 runs in 8 innings, and picked up the victory.
Mike Gonzalez(0-2) was the loser in relief. He gave up 1 hit and no walks
without retiring a batter.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
▼
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
-
▼
June 2014
(62)
- BAL 33 vs. TBY 36
- OAK 33 vs. TEX 34
- TEX 33 vs. OAK 32
- TEX 32 vs. OAK 31
- CLE 36 vs. DET 33
- CLE 35 vs. SEA 29
- SEA 28 vs. CLE 34
- TBY 35 vs. CLE 33
- CLE 32 vs. TBY 34
- DET 32 vs. OAK 30
- DET 31 vs. KC 36
- DET 30 vs. KC 35
- DET 29 vs. BOS 34
- BOS 33 vs. DET 28
- BOS 32 vs. CLE 31
- BAL 32 vs. TBY 33
- SEA 27 vs. BOS 31
- BOS 30 vs. SEA 26
- CLE 30 vs. DET 27
- DET 26 vs. CLE 29
- TEX 31 vs. LAA 36
- TEX 30 vs. LAA 35
- LAA 34 vs. TEX 29
- LAA 33 vs. TEX 28
- KC 34 vs. MIN 34
- KC 33 vs. MIN 33
- CHI 32 vs. KC 32
- CHI 31 vs. KC 31
- KC 30 vs. CHI 30
- KC 29 vs. CHI 29
- CLE 28 vs. BOS 29
- OAK 29 vs. TEX 27
- TEX 26 vs. HOU 30
- TEX 25 vs. TBY 32
- TBY 31 vs. TEX 24
- OAK 28 vs. HOU 29
- OAK 27 vs. HOU 28
- BOS 28 vs. NYY 34
- BOS 27 vs. NYY 33
- NYY 32 vs. BOS 26
- NYY 31 vs. BOS 25
- CLE 27 vs. TOR 34
- TOR 33 vs. CLE 26
- NYY 30 vs. TOR 32
- TOR 31 vs. NYY 29
- KC 28 vs. LAA 32
- LAA 31 vs. KC 27
- LAA 30 vs. OAK 26
- DET 25 vs. SEA 25
- SEA 24 vs. DET 24
- SEA 23 vs. NYY 28
- TOR 30 vs. NYY 27
- NYY 26 vs. TOR 29
- LAA 29 vs. TOR 28
- TOR 27 vs. LAA 28
- DET 23 vs. TBY 30
- TBY 29 vs. DET 22
- TBY 28 vs. SEA 22
- MIN 32 vs. CLE 25
- MIN 31 vs. CLE 24
- CLE 23 vs. MIN 30
- CLE 22 vs. MIN 29
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Thursday, June 26, 2014
TEX 32 vs. OAK 31
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment