BOXSCORE: 2011 Los Angeles(AL) Angels At 2011 Oakland A's 5/28/2011
Angels AB R H RBI AVG A's AB R H RBI AVG
M.Izturis SS 4 0 0 0 .300 J.Weeks 2B 5 0 2 0 .163
B-M.Trout LF 1 0 0 0 .236 C.Crisp CF 5 0 1 0 .276
P.Bourjos CF 4 1 1 1 .233 H.Matsui DH 3 0 3 0 .151
H.Kendrick 2B 4 0 0 0 .324 J.Willingham LF 4 0 1 0 .239
T.Hunter RF 4 1 2 0 .293 D.Dejesus RF 4 0 0 0 .278
A.Callaspo 3B 2 0 0 0 .271 S.Sizemore 3B 4 0 2 0 .277
V.Wells LF 3 0 1 0 .241 B.Allen 1B 4 0 0 0 .000
A-E.Aybar PH,SS 1 0 1 1 .326 K.Suzuki C 4 0 1 0 .272
M.Trumbo 1B 3 0 0 0 .244 C.Pennington SS 3 0 0 0 .224
B.Abreu DH 4 0 0 0 .125
J.Mathis C 4 0 0 0 .279
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 34 2 5 2 Totals 36 0 10 0
A-Pinch Hit For Wells In 8th Inning
B-Subbed Defensively (LF) For Izturis In 8th Inning
Angels.......... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 - 2 5 0
A's............. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 10 2
Angels (16-14) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
D.Haren WIN(4-3) 9 10 0 0 2 7 0 125 1.77
Totals 9 10 0 0 2 7 0
A's (13-13) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
G.Gonzalez LOSS(3-4) 7 2/3 4 2 2 2 7 1 126 2.23
T.Ross 1 1/3 1 0 0 1 1 0 27 7.36
Totals 9 5 2 2 3 8 1
ATTENDANCE- 32,128 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Ted Barrett, Brian Runge, Marvin Hudson, Tim McClelland
T- 3:08
LEFT ON BASE- Angels: 8 A's:11
DOUBLE PLAYS- Angels: 1 A's: 0
ERRORS- J.Weeks, C.Pennington
DOUBLES- J.Willingham(5th), S.Sizemore(10th)
HOME RUNS- P.Bourjos(3rd)
RBIs- P.Bourjos(12th), E.Aybar(14th)
STOLEN BASES- M.Izturis(1st)
WALKS- A.Callaspo-2, M.Trumbo, H.Matsui, C.Pennington
STRIKE OUTS- M.Izturis, P.Bourjos-2, A.Callaspo, M.Trumbo, B.Abreu, J.Mathis-2,
J.Weeks, D.Dejesus, S.Sizemore, B.Allen-3, K.Suzuki
GIDP- C.Crisp
2-out RBI- E.Aybar
RLISP 2-out- C.Pennington-2, P.Bourjos, D.Dejesus-3, B.Abreu-2, J.Mathis,
J.Willingham, M.Trumbo
Dan Haren threw a complete game shutout as the Los Angeles(AL) Angels beat the
Oakland A's by a score of 2 to 0.
Haren(4-3) earned his pay with a solid performance for Los Angeles(AL). He
went 9 innings and surrended up 10 hits and 2 walks reducing his ERA from
2.05 to 1.77. Oakland had 10 hits in the game while Los Angeles(AL) had 5,
but Los Angeles(AL) had the more timely hits.
Gio Gonzalez(3-4) took the loss. He allowed 4 hits and 2 walks in 7 and 2/3
innings.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
▼
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
-
▼
June 2014
(62)
- BAL 33 vs. TBY 36
- OAK 33 vs. TEX 34
- TEX 33 vs. OAK 32
- TEX 32 vs. OAK 31
- CLE 36 vs. DET 33
- CLE 35 vs. SEA 29
- SEA 28 vs. CLE 34
- TBY 35 vs. CLE 33
- CLE 32 vs. TBY 34
- DET 32 vs. OAK 30
- DET 31 vs. KC 36
- DET 30 vs. KC 35
- DET 29 vs. BOS 34
- BOS 33 vs. DET 28
- BOS 32 vs. CLE 31
- BAL 32 vs. TBY 33
- SEA 27 vs. BOS 31
- BOS 30 vs. SEA 26
- CLE 30 vs. DET 27
- DET 26 vs. CLE 29
- TEX 31 vs. LAA 36
- TEX 30 vs. LAA 35
- LAA 34 vs. TEX 29
- LAA 33 vs. TEX 28
- KC 34 vs. MIN 34
- KC 33 vs. MIN 33
- CHI 32 vs. KC 32
- CHI 31 vs. KC 31
- KC 30 vs. CHI 30
- KC 29 vs. CHI 29
- CLE 28 vs. BOS 29
- OAK 29 vs. TEX 27
- TEX 26 vs. HOU 30
- TEX 25 vs. TBY 32
- TBY 31 vs. TEX 24
- OAK 28 vs. HOU 29
- OAK 27 vs. HOU 28
- BOS 28 vs. NYY 34
- BOS 27 vs. NYY 33
- NYY 32 vs. BOS 26
- NYY 31 vs. BOS 25
- CLE 27 vs. TOR 34
- TOR 33 vs. CLE 26
- NYY 30 vs. TOR 32
- TOR 31 vs. NYY 29
- KC 28 vs. LAA 32
- LAA 31 vs. KC 27
- LAA 30 vs. OAK 26
- DET 25 vs. SEA 25
- SEA 24 vs. DET 24
- SEA 23 vs. NYY 28
- TOR 30 vs. NYY 27
- NYY 26 vs. TOR 29
- LAA 29 vs. TOR 28
- TOR 27 vs. LAA 28
- DET 23 vs. TBY 30
- TBY 29 vs. DET 22
- TBY 28 vs. SEA 22
- MIN 32 vs. CLE 25
- MIN 31 vs. CLE 24
- CLE 23 vs. MIN 30
- CLE 22 vs. MIN 29
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Friday, June 6, 2014
LAA 30 vs. OAK 26
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment