BOXSCORE: 2011 Tampa Bay Rays At 2011 Texas Rangers 6/1/2011
Rays AB R H RBI AVG Rangers AB R H RBI AVG
B.Zobrist 2B 3 1 0 0 .262 I.Kinsler 2B 5 1 3 1 .280
S.Rodriguez SS 4 1 1 1 .184 M.Young DH 5 1 2 0 .357
C.Kotchman 1B 4 0 1 0 .309 M.Napoli C 2 0 0 1 .411
E.Longoria 3B 3 1 2 1 .235 J.Hamilton CF 3 0 1 1 .375
M.Joyce RF 4 0 0 0 .275 A.Beltre 3B 4 1 1 1 .357
B.Upton CF 4 0 0 0 .248 N.Cruz RF 4 0 2 0 .241
J.Damon DH 4 1 1 2 .303 D.Murphy LF 4 0 0 0 .354
K.Shoppach C 4 1 2 0 .225 E.Andrus SS 4 1 1 0 .298
S.Fuld LF 4 1 1 1 .250 M.Moreland 1B 4 0 0 0 .275
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 34 6 8 5 Totals 35 4 10 4
Rays............ 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 2 - 6 8 0
Rangers......... 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 - 4 10 1
Rays (22-9) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
J.Shields WIN(4-2) 5 9 3 3 1 3 1 87 5.05
J.Peralta HOLD(4th) 2 0 0 0 1 3 0 25 1.62
K.Farnsworth SAVE(10th) 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 29 3.46
Totals 9 10 4 4 2 7 1
Rangers (17-7) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
M.Harrison LOSS(1-2) 5 5 4 4 1 3 0 67 4.61
D.Oliver BS(2nd) 4 3 2 2 1 4 1 59 2.25
Totals 9 8 6 6 2 7 1
ATTENDANCE- 32,321 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Rob Drake, Gary Darling, Bruce Dreckman, Paul Emmel
T- 2:50
LEFT ON BASE- Rays: 3 Rangers: 7
DOUBLE PLAYS- Rays: 1 Rangers: 0
ERRORS- M.Napoli
DOUBLES- E.Longoria-2(6th), M.Young-2(8th), N.Cruz(6th), E.Andrus(3rd)
TRIPLES- S.Fuld(2nd)
HOME RUNS- J.Damon(6th), A.Beltre(12th)
RBIs- S.Rodriguez(3rd), E.Longoria(23rd), J.Damon-2(20th), S.Fuld(5th),
I.Kinsler(22nd), M.Napoli(31st), J.Hamilton(21st), A.Beltre(31st)
STOLEN BASES- S.Rodriguez(2nd)
SACRIFICE FLIES- J.Hamilton
WALKS- B.Zobrist, E.Longoria, M.Napoli-2
STRIKE OUTS- B.Zobrist-3, S.Rodriguez, C.Kotchman, M.Joyce-2, M.Young, M.Napoli,
A.Beltre, N.Cruz, D.Murphy-2, M.Moreland
GIDP- D.Murphy
2-out RBI- A.Beltre, J.Damon-2
RLISP 2-out- A.Beltre-3, B.Upton, M.Moreland
In a close game the Tampa Bay Rays got by the Texas Rangers by the score of 6
to 4.
Tampa Bay scored 4 runs in the 6th inning when they had 4 base hits. They
would be enough to earn the win. Tampa Bay managed 8 hits in their victory.
The win went to James Shields(4-2) who allowed 3 runs in 5 innings. Kyle
Farnsworth was credited with his 10th save. Matt Harrison(1-2) was the
losing pitcher.
'I didn't have my best stuff but sometimes you just get lucky,' Shields said,
'this was one of those times.'
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
▼
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
-
▼
June 2014
(62)
- BAL 33 vs. TBY 36
- OAK 33 vs. TEX 34
- TEX 33 vs. OAK 32
- TEX 32 vs. OAK 31
- CLE 36 vs. DET 33
- CLE 35 vs. SEA 29
- SEA 28 vs. CLE 34
- TBY 35 vs. CLE 33
- CLE 32 vs. TBY 34
- DET 32 vs. OAK 30
- DET 31 vs. KC 36
- DET 30 vs. KC 35
- DET 29 vs. BOS 34
- BOS 33 vs. DET 28
- BOS 32 vs. CLE 31
- BAL 32 vs. TBY 33
- SEA 27 vs. BOS 31
- BOS 30 vs. SEA 26
- CLE 30 vs. DET 27
- DET 26 vs. CLE 29
- TEX 31 vs. LAA 36
- TEX 30 vs. LAA 35
- LAA 34 vs. TEX 29
- LAA 33 vs. TEX 28
- KC 34 vs. MIN 34
- KC 33 vs. MIN 33
- CHI 32 vs. KC 32
- CHI 31 vs. KC 31
- KC 30 vs. CHI 30
- KC 29 vs. CHI 29
- CLE 28 vs. BOS 29
- OAK 29 vs. TEX 27
- TEX 26 vs. HOU 30
- TEX 25 vs. TBY 32
- TBY 31 vs. TEX 24
- OAK 28 vs. HOU 29
- OAK 27 vs. HOU 28
- BOS 28 vs. NYY 34
- BOS 27 vs. NYY 33
- NYY 32 vs. BOS 26
- NYY 31 vs. BOS 25
- CLE 27 vs. TOR 34
- TOR 33 vs. CLE 26
- NYY 30 vs. TOR 32
- TOR 31 vs. NYY 29
- KC 28 vs. LAA 32
- LAA 31 vs. KC 27
- LAA 30 vs. OAK 26
- DET 25 vs. SEA 25
- SEA 24 vs. DET 24
- SEA 23 vs. NYY 28
- TOR 30 vs. NYY 27
- NYY 26 vs. TOR 29
- LAA 29 vs. TOR 28
- TOR 27 vs. LAA 28
- DET 23 vs. TBY 30
- TBY 29 vs. DET 22
- TBY 28 vs. SEA 22
- MIN 32 vs. CLE 25
- MIN 31 vs. CLE 24
- CLE 23 vs. MIN 30
- CLE 22 vs. MIN 29
- ► April 2014 (37)
- ► March 2014 (72)
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Thursday, June 12, 2014
TBY 31 vs. TEX 24
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment