BOXSCORE: 2011 Chicago (AL) Whitesox At 2011 Minnesota Twins 4/26/2011
Whitesox AB R H RBI AVG Twins AB R H RBI AVG
A.Ramirez SS 4 1 1 0 .259 J.Mauer C 5 0 2 0 .278
B.Lillibridge CF 4 0 0 0 .172 A.Casilla 2B 4 0 1 0 .235
P.Konerko 1B 4 0 1 0 .333 M.Cuddyer RF 4 1 1 0 .235
C.Quentin DH 4 0 0 0 .267 J.Morneau 1B 4 1 3 1 .235
D.Viciedo RF 4 0 2 0 .217 J.Kubel DH 4 0 1 0 .294
G.Beckham 2B 4 0 1 0 .271 D.Span CF 2 2 1 0 .167
A.Pierzynski C 4 0 0 0 .079 T.Plouffe SS 4 1 1 1 .222
J.Pierre LF 4 0 1 0 .132 D.Valencia 3B 4 0 1 1 .316
O.Vizquel 3B 3 0 1 0 .357 B.Revere LF 4 0 2 1 .353
A-A.Dunn PH 1 0 0 0 .000
-- -- -- --- -- -- -- ---
Totals 36 1 7 0 Totals 35 5 13 4
A-Pinch Hit For Vizquel In 9th Inning
Whitesox........ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 - 1 7 0
Twins........... 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 - 5 13 2
Whitesox (5-11) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
P.Humber LOSS(1-2) 6 1/3 9 2 2 1 4 0 100 2.66
M.Thornton 0 1/3 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 2.25
J.Frasor 0 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 2.84
C.Sale 0 1/3 1 2 2 1 0 0 11 6.75
S.Santos 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 6 4.50
J.Crain 0 2/3 1 0 0 0 1 0 10 0.90
Totals 8 13 5 5 2 5 0
Twins (3-2) IP H R ER BB SO HR PC ERA
C.Pavano WIN(1-0) 7 2/3 7 1 0 0 5 0 104 0.00
J.Nathan HOLD(1st) 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 16 3.00
M.Capps 0 1/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0.00
Totals 9 7 1 0 0 6 0
ATTENDANCE- 25,191 DATE- TIME- Day
UMPIRES- Dana Demuth, Kerwin Danley, Doug Eddings, Paul Nauert
T- 2:55
LEFT ON BASE- Whitesox: 8 Twins: 8
DOUBLE PLAYS- Whitesox: 1 Twins: 0
ERRORS- T.Plouffe, D.Valencia
DOUBLES- J.Morneau-2(3rd), T.Plouffe(3rd)
RBIs- J.Morneau(1st), T.Plouffe(2nd), D.Valencia(5th), B.Revere(2nd)
STOLEN BASES- D.Span(1st)
WALKS- D.Span-2
STRIKE OUTS- B.Lillibridge-3, C.Quentin, D.Viciedo, G.Beckham, A.Casilla,
M.Cuddyer, D.Span, T.Plouffe, D.Valencia
GIDP- J.Kubel
WILD PITCHES- S.Santos
2-out RBI- J.Morneau, B.Revere
RLISP 2-out- T.Plouffe, A.Ramirez-2, M.Cuddyer-2, D.Viciedo-2, A.Dunn
The Minnesota Twins bested the Chicago (AL) Whitesox by a 5 to 1 score at
Target Field.
Minnesota set the tone of the game in the first inning plating one baserunner
utilizing 2 base hits. Minnesota finished with 13 hits while Chicago (AL)
ended up with 7.
The victory was credited to Carl Pavano(1-0) who went 7 and 2/3 innings,
allowing 1 run. The losing pitcher was Philip Humber(1-2). He gave up 2 runs
and 9 hits in 6 and 1/3 innings.
Blog Archive
-
►
2018
(9)
- ► January 2018 (9)
-
►
2017
(381)
- ► December 2017 (30)
- ► November 2017 (18)
- ► October 2017 (65)
- ► September 2017 (52)
- ► August 2017 (32)
- ► April 2017 (6)
- ► March 2017 (24)
- ► February 2017 (37)
- ► January 2017 (44)
-
►
2016
(245)
- ► December 2016 (27)
- ► November 2016 (29)
- ► October 2016 (28)
- ► September 2016 (26)
- ► August 2016 (22)
- ► March 2016 (10)
- ► February 2016 (17)
- ► January 2016 (37)
-
►
2015
(432)
- ► December 2015 (32)
- ► November 2015 (48)
- ► October 2015 (48)
- ► September 2015 (51)
- ► August 2015 (26)
- ► April 2015 (47)
- ► March 2015 (54)
- ► February 2015 (53)
- ► January 2015 (56)
-
▼
2014
(357)
- ► December 2014 (27)
- ► November 2014 (31)
- ► October 2014 (2)
- ► September 2014 (10)
- ► August 2014 (4)
- ► April 2014 (37)
-
▼
March 2014
(72)
- BAL 19 vs. KC 15
- KC 14 vs. BAL 18
- BAL 17 vs. NYY 14
- NYY 13 vs. MIN 14
- MIN 13 vs. NYY 12
- MIN 12 vs. TBY 12
- TBY 11 vs. MIN 11
- BAL 16 vs. NYY 11
- HOU 19 vs. BAL 15
- BAL 14 vs. HOU 18
- TOR 19 vs. BOS 16
- TOR 18 vs. BOS 15
- BOS 14 vs TOR 17
- BOS 13 vs. TOR 16
- DET 11 vs. TEX 19
- TEX 18 vs. DET 10
- TEX 17 vs. SEA 13
- BOS 12 vs. TBY 10
- BOS 11 vs. TBY 9
- TBY 8 vs. BOS 10
- TBY 7 vs. BOS 9
- NYY 10 vs. CLE 11
- HOU 17 vs. DET 9
- DET 8 vs. HOU 16
- KC 13 vs. BOS 8
- BOS 7 vs. KC 12
- LAA 15 vs. SEA 12
- LAA 14 vs. SEA 11
- SEA 10 vs. LAA 13
- SEA 9 vs. LAA 12
- MIN 10 vs. TEX 16
- TEX 15 vs. MIN 9
- OAK 10 vs. LAA 11
- TOR 15 vs. KC 11
- MIN 8 vs. CHI 19
- MIN 7 vs. CHI 18
- CHI 17 vs. MIN 6
- CHI 16 vs. MIN 5
- OAK 9 vs. TBY 6
- TBY 5 vs. OAK 8
- CLE 10 vs. CHI 15
- CLE 9 vs. CHI 14
- CHI 13 vs. CLE 8
- CHI 12 vs. CLE 7
- BAL 13 vs. TOR 14
- BAL 12 vs. TOR 13
- TOR 12 vs. CHI 11
- CLE 6 vs. KC 10
- CLE 5 vs. KC 9
- LAA 10 vs. HOU 15
- LAA 9 vs. HOU 14
- LAA 8 vs. NYY 9
- NYY 8 vs. LAA 7
- TEX 14 vs. BAL 11
- BAL 10 vs. TEX 13
- CHI 10 vs. TEX 12
- TEX 11 vs. CHI 9
- KC 8 vs. DET 7
- KC 7 vs. DET 6
- OAK 7 vs. BAL 9
- BAL 8 vs. OAK 6
- CHI 8 vs. HOU 13
- HOU 12 vs. CHI 7
- NYY 7 vs. TEX 10
- TEX 9 vs. TOR 11
- TOR 10 vs. TEX 8
- NYY 6 vs. SEA 8
- DET 5 vs. NYY 5
- NYY 4 vs. DET 4
- CHI 6 vs. TOR 9
- BAL 7 vs. LAA 6
- LAA 5 vs. BAL 6
- ► February 2014 (29)
- ► January 2014 (24)
-
►
2013
(393)
- ► November 2013 (44)
- ► October 2013 (40)
- ► September 2013 (44)
- ► August 2013 (42)
- ► April 2013 (2)
- ► March 2013 (32)
- ► February 2013 (31)
- ► January 2013 (55)
-
►
2012
(460)
- ► December 2012 (64)
- ► November 2012 (58)
- ► October 2012 (54)
- ► September 2012 (20)
- ► August 2012 (20)
- ► April 2012 (36)
- ► March 2012 (50)
- ► February 2012 (44)
- ► January 2012 (18)
-
►
2011
(533)
- ► December 2011 (27)
- ► November 2011 (56)
- ► October 2011 (41)
- ► September 2011 (37)
- ► August 2011 (52)
- ► April 2011 (35)
- ► March 2011 (67)
- ► February 2011 (90)
- ► January 2011 (55)
-
►
2010
(203)
- ► December 2010 (18)
- ► November 2010 (17)
- ► October 2010 (4)
- ► September 2010 (3)
- ► August 2010 (7)
- ► April 2010 (18)
- ► March 2010 (41)
- ► February 2010 (34)
- ► January 2010 (48)
-
►
2009
(441)
- ► December 2009 (36)
- ► November 2009 (43)
- ► October 2009 (47)
- ► September 2009 (20)
- ► August 2009 (50)
- ► April 2009 (61)
- ► March 2009 (22)
- ► January 2009 (32)
-
►
2008
(383)
- ► December 2008 (27)
- ► November 2008 (64)
- ► October 2008 (48)
- ► September 2008 (17)
- ► August 2008 (42)
- ► April 2008 (28)
- ► March 2008 (34)
- ► February 2008 (25)
- ► January 2008 (44)
-
►
2007
(144)
- ► December 2007 (20)
- ► November 2007 (35)
- ► October 2007 (18)
- ► September 2007 (27)
- ► August 2007 (26)
Saturday, March 15, 2014
CHI 16 vs. MIN 5
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment